|
Posted By Jessica Teets CCEP, Purdue University,
Tuesday, October 18, 2022
Updated: Monday, October 17, 2022
|
Articles on topics that may affect your organization’s policies
As we continue the fall semester, the Blog Committee would like to share some of the articles we’ve been reading that relate to policy administration in higher education. We have sorted them by subject matter for easier browsing.
Title IX
Hurry Up and Wait: What Can You Do While Awaiting the
Title IX Final Rule? By Alisha Carter Harris for TNG Consulting, JD Supra, Sept. 27, 2022
Department of Education Releases New Guidance on
Pregnancy and Related Conditions By Susan D. Friedfel, Carol R. Ashley, Crystal L. Tyler, and Desiree H. Langley, Jackson Lewis P.C., Oct. 10, 2022
Title IX Mandatory Reporting Expansion Under Fire By Katherine Knott, Inside Higher Ed, Sept. 27, 2022
Health and Wellness
At
One University, Resistance to a New Covid Policy Comes From Inside the House By Francie Diep, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 14, 2022
Remote Work
What must leaders consider as they develop permanent
remote work policies? By Jon McNaughtan, Catherine Whaley, and Chelsea Wallace, Times Higher Education, Oct. 12, 2022
Academic Freedom and Women's Health
University of Idaho: Academic freedom policy, birth
control access haven’t changed By Becca Savransky for Idaho Statesman, The Spokesman Review, Oct. 5, 2022
Inclusion and Institutional Culture
University of Guelph Establishes Anti-Racism Policy Statement Press Release by University
of Guelph, Education News Canada, Oct. 13, 2022
We need to have new conversations about culture By Edie Goldberg, Talent Management and HR (TLNT), Oct. 11, 2022
Student Admissions and Accessibility
Why Would-Be Students Aren’t Choosing College By Sara Weissman, Inside Higher Education, Sept. 29, 2022
Admissions to the Major
By Scott Jaschik, Inside Higher Ed, Oct. 3, 2022
When ‘Rigor’ Targets Disabled Students By Katie Rose Guest Pryal, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 6, 2022
Campus Safety
Sexual assaults prompt Republicans, Democrats to
relaunch Campus Safety bill By Chris Burt, University Business, Oct. 7, 2022
Concordia University dragging feet on sexual violence
policy, student unions say By Erika Morris, CBC News, October 5, 2022
Transcript Withholding
Most
Colleges Withhold Students’ Transcripts Over Debt. That’s Starting to Change.
By Sylvia Goodman, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Oct. 6, 2022
Higher Ed Groups Urge Review of Transcript Withholding
By Katherine Knott, Inside Higher Ed, Oct. 13, 2022
Tags:
academic freedom
accessibility
admissions
anti-racism
birth control access
campus safety
covid
culture
disabled students
enrollment
health
health and wellness
inclusion
pregnancy
remote work
sexual assault
sexual violence
Title IX
transcript withholding
transcripts
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Lisa Biagas, Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts,
Monday, August 16, 2021
|
Complicated, but has a Positive Impact
The summer of 2020 was tumultuous for many reasons. Our campuses were trying to respond to increased racial tensions, managing the pandemic, and we were working hard to make changes as a result of the new Title IX regulations that would keep our campuses compliant. The Title IX regulations that took effect on August 14, 2020, had a significant impact on the manner in which our campuses investigate and address claims of sex discrimination and harassment. Until now, there have been no binding federal regulations related to sexual harassment under Title IX, only administrative guidance issued by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights. The new regulations expanded the requirements for Title IX grievance procedures, which required significant policy and procedure revisions, and training. Below are a few of the 2020 changes: - Narrowed the definition of sexual assault under Title IX
- Limited the obligation to investigate complaints only to conduct that occurred in the college’s program or activity (and not to unrelated off-campus conduct)
- Mandated response obligations of colleges (i.e., providing supportive measures)
- Provided more detailed grievance procedures
- Made hearings optional
- Allowed colleges to choose what standard of evidence to use (e.g., the preponderance of evidence v. clear and convincing)
- Required colleges to offer both parties an appeal from a determination regarding responsibility
- Implemented an evaluative/vetting process to ensure that the Title IX Coordinator, investigator, decision-maker, or any person designated by a recipient to facilitate an informal resolution process does not have a conflict of interest or bias for or against complainants or respondents generally or an individual complainant or respondent
- Required training for Title IX Coordinators, investigators, decision-makers, and any person who facilitates an informal resolution process
These changes were greeted with much consternation and controversy on many campuses. We have been operating under the new regulations for one year now while still navigating a global pandemic. If, for a moment, we review the Title IX guidelines through a historical lens, there is a complicated but positive impact. When you look around our campuses today, you will see a very different view than what you would have seen in the early 20th century. American society had a definite idea of what a woman's life should look like: wife, mother, homemaker. Women were generally not considered equals. They were expected to marry and raise children, not go to college. Those who did go to college were only allowed to participate in certain fields, such as teaching, nursing, home economics, child development, or social work. Fast forward to 1972, as part of the Education Amendments of 1972, Title IX effectively leveled the playing field. Title IX prevents discrimination based on sex, ensuring that no person in the United States will be excluded from participation or from receiving benefits while pursuing an education in any program receiving federal financial assistance. In a historical context, Title IX became a triumph for women and girls who faced more gender barriers and restrictions than men. However, it is a common misconception that Title IX is for girls and women. The law actually benefits everyone, because it effectively eliminates discrimination based on gender--female, male, transgender and gender nonconforming. It is crucial to understand different perspectives of what the August 14, 2020, regulations mean for students and the changes that campuses had to make. As stewards of education, we must ensure the best experience possible for our students, faculty, and staff. In the coming weeks, as we start the new academic year, please remain dedicated to learning about Title IX and brushing up on regulations periodically so that you can provide a safe and equitable learning environment for all who seek it. Our chapter in history depends on it.
Tags:
grievance
Lisa Biagas
procedures
regulations
sexual harassment
Title IX
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Deborah Bartlett, Washington State University,
Monday, May 10, 2021
|
Articles on topics that may affect your organization’s policies As we move into the summer semester, the Blog Committee would like to share some of the articles we’ve been reading that relate to policy administration in higher education. - Title IX Public Hearing Scheduled for June
By Alexis Gravely, Inside Higher Ed, May 7, 2021 - What Colleges Require the COVID-19 Vaccine?
By Staff Writers, Best Colleges, May 6, 2021 - Johns Hopkins Increasing Minimum Wage to $15
By Mychael Schnell, The Hill, May 6, 2021 - Students Are on the Move. Their Financial Aid Is Not
By Juana Sanchez and Lara Couturier, Inside Higher Ed, May 6, 2021 - COVID-19: Updates for Canada’s Universities
By UA/AU, University Affairs, May 5, 2021 - At Some Colleges, Remote Work Could Be Here to Stay
By Lindsay Ellis, The Chronicle of Higher Education, May 5, 2021 - Hundreds Protest over Yale Contract Talks
By Mary E. O'Leary, New Haven Register, May 1, 2021 - COVID-19 Has Altered Student Expectations for Data Privacy
By Adam Stone, EdTech Focus on Higher Education, April 28, 2021 - Keeping an Eye on Biden Administration's Higher Education Policies
By Anna Mazarakis, Princeton Alumni Weekly, May 2021 Issue - Protecting and Ensuring Student Privacy
By Mary Ellen Buzzelli, Inside Higher Ed, April 16, 2021 - Mandatory COVID Vaccines for Students: Legal Pain Point or Panacea?
By Michael Vernick, Brennan Meier, Molly Whitman, and Jessica Mannon, University Business, April 16, 2021
Tags:
Canada
COVID-19
cybersecurity
data
employment contract
financial aid
free speech
gap
gender
hot topics
HR
information
IT
legal
minimum wage
news
pandemic
phishing
policy
policy in the news
poverty
privacy
records
remote work
sexual harassment
students
Title IX
vaccines
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Meg Resue, Rowan College of South Jersey,
Monday, December 3, 2018
|
How Centralized Policies Affect Productivity
I work at a community college that, like many of its peer institutions, is experiencing declining funding and, at the same time, escalating regulatory mandates. I recently had the opportunity to speak with our executive director of diversity and equity, Affirmative Action/Title IX officer about her challenges with regulatory requirements and how the establishment of a policy office and a centralized policy library aided her productivity.
Like many of us on campus, the executive director wears many hats, with the assistance of one shared staff member. Here at the college, she administers all programs related to diversity, equity, Affirmative Action, and Title IX, and is responsible for the review and investigation of complaints regarding discrimination, sexual harassment, dating and domestic violence, stalking, Title IX, and workplace issues. During our talk, the executive director noted that budgetary constraints and Title IX were her current challenges. Nearly half of her allotted budget, despite collaboration with other departments to share costs, goes toward campus-wide mandated training initiatives; in her opinion, considering today’s social environment, more training is needed above and beyond the required levels. In addition, a big chunk of her time is spent staying current on national news and the changing federal policy environment. Continual monitoring is necessary to remain ahead of the curve in managing risk, where missteps could be financially catastrophic to a small public institution. As an example, the executive director mentioned that what has been keeping her awake at night is a Proposed Title IX Regulation, released on November 16 for 60 days of public comment. This proposal came after the Department of Education’s decision in September 2017 to rescind prior guidance from 2011 and 2014, leaving in place the 2001 Guidance. These changes have left the college’s published policy in limbo for now, but it will require considerable revision in the not-too-distant future. It is still too early to do a deep dive into the work of revision and procedural considerations until the proposed regulation is finalized.
Over my college’s 50-plus-year history, published policy has been a hit-or-miss affair, and what policy existed was more likely to be held in a multitude of forms scattered across departments. Since the 2013 creation of the college’s centralized policy office and policy library, the executive director claims to have experienced an increase in her office’s productivity. As she mentioned many times during our conversation, policy in her wheelhouse is always changing, which requires timely updates. She indicated that the services the policy office offers save her time by providing best-practice research, help with writing and editing during the development or revision stage, and shepherding the policy draft through review/approval processes; this allows her more time for implementing budget-friendly staff training and professional development strategies.
It was a fortunate day for the college when two staff members shuffled off to Ithaca, New York to participate in a two-day Policy Development Program hosted by Cornell University’s School of Continuing Education. Since then, the college has done a 180-degree turn, bringing its policies and procedures up to date, providing colleagues with services that increase productivity and regulatory awareness. To all my community college peers: the Policy Development Program’s return on investment is immeasurable. As for ACUPA, its value as a resource tool to this college continues to be invaluable.
Tags:
Collaboration
Community College
Department of Education
Policy Development
Policy Training
Productivity
Title IX
Permalink
| Comments (2)
|
|