|
Posted By Gina Kennedy, NOSM University,
Monday, March 13, 2023
|
An Untapped Potential
In the past few years, crisis, cultural shifts, and financial woes have led to a rise of complexity in maintaining our policy systems within our institutions. Meeting all the regulations can be challenging, as they are constantly changing. In addition, institutions are feeling the pressure from regulators, internal staff and faculty, and the community at large to maintain the regulations. Challenges faced yesterday are not the challenges we will face tomorrow or next year. Do you have the confidence that your policies could stand up to regulatory scrutiny? Does this mean that we need to become even more resilient and inventive – is there any untapped potential out there?
As policy leaders we have learned that we need systems and processes to get things done. But is that enough? Even the most skilled person today is challenged with the immense workload of continuous changes and updates required for policy management. Even the way we distribute, collect, account for and present changes has undergone enormous change. It is not just a check list and process – we need to manage risk, ensure data security and privacy while balancing access and inclusiveness and external influences – it all seems daunting, and to top it all off, failing to comply with the ever-evolving regulations can lead to costly fines and lawsuits.
We are looking virtually everywhere for indicators of change, racing with time to have key policies, procedures and training completed to be compliant. Today, no one is standing waiting for the next change to come down the hall, which makes it even more important that we work with synergy across the institution.
We must support and arm ourselves with the tools, processes and technology that facilitate clear communication. We need to define the review and reflection process of our policies, cultivate open discussion and dialogue all while engaging with other departments and units about the need for change, seek an understanding of the barriers for everyone and then provide the necessary follow up to make the needed changes for lasting growth and compliance.
In September, I wrote “Don’t wait for a crisis to create an efficient policy management system.” That ‘safety net’ is one great way to engage a team to ensure compliance, a tool that builds structure – whether you are a small scale operation or a larger scaled institution, a system and a plan is critical. A plan gives both leaders and others a path forward and provides the principles needed to navigate change. In December 2022, Michele Gross (University of Minnesota) wrote “The First Element: Meeting at the Intersection of Policy and Compliance” - outlining the first of seven elements of a compliance program and the importance of the system to frame our compliance at our institutions. For those who may not be aware, the seven elements of a legally effective compliance program are:
-
Policies & Procedures
- Chief Compliance Officer/Compliance Committee
- Education & Training
- Reporting
- Monitoring & Auditing
- Enforcement
- Responding To Issues
GRC 20/20 Research, LLC wrote “A Tsunami of Change Overwhelms Compliance,” which states that some institutions have broken processes and insufficient resources to manage compliance. I know that there is not one size fits all -- there can’t be. This is why we must continue to evolve – we should rearrange our priorities when we have too much of anything as Sara Gigeroff (University of New Brunswick) wrote in her blog What’s In Your Closet? (Feb 2023). More importantly she states that communicating, setting boundaries, purging, and revaluating are all key elements in managing our policy framework…and our closets!
There's no time like the present to simplify. Legacy systems are expensive and difficult to use. Manual processing is far too time-consuming and in a hybrid environment its not effective. I say m ake retention simple for users and administrators, so they don’t have to interact with files in a separate, siloed repository or go through cumbersome, manual processes. We must invest in this process for it to be effective. Who can remember five-sheet carbon paper? Now that was cumbersome! We have evolved since carbon paper, but some institutions are still stuck in the dark ages when it comes to making a compliance program a priority.
Who is your untapped potential – identify them and get them on board. This process, more than ever, needs support and buy-in from our leadership and other stakeholders across the institution to be successful (more hands make less work). Beware of analysis paralysis – encourage administrators to work with broad strokes. Show them how proactively setting the boundaries for document lifecycle management, rules for sharing and record management classifications can make work simpler, more consistent and save money. If it was possible to make policies ‘fun’ I would say do that too!
Other areas that untap that potential are field experts like our colleagues at ACUPA . They are an excellent way to leverage all our tools – garner support and encourage others to join in the conversations and become members.
It only takes one incident, one mistake, one error to mark an institution’s reputation and erode trust. In my opinion, our untapped potential may simply be harnessing the power of workplace collaboration and an ability to accelerate the processes to protect our most valuable information.

Tags:
change
collaboration
crisis
Gina Kennedy
innovation
legislation
ompliance
policy
record keeping
records
records management
Permalink
| Comments (2)
|
|
Posted By Meg Resue, Rowan College of South Jersey,
Wednesday, September 16, 2020
|
How Two Colleges Continue to Become One in a Pandemic
My last blog post occurred in June, about three months into the 2020 pandemic. Institutionally, we were already experiencing a sea of change as having merged with another college forming a branch to the main campus location. At the time, the merger was just eight months old with a new name, a new identity as one college and two distinct cultures.
In March, we were well into our spring semester, when the State of New Jersey’s governor mandated by executive order for its citizenry to stay at home due to the pandemic. This created a perfect storm of events that intensified the velocity of change, necessitating the college to refocus its energy toward switching face-to-face classes to an entirely online environment during spring break so that returning students could finish out their semester online. This mandate was the most restrictive of the governor’s executive orders. Other mandates have since followed guided by the state’s The Road Back plan structured in four stages, with the last stage titled, “New Normal.” As of this writing, New Jersey remains in stage two, so we have a way to go before hitting the last stage and can move on to experience whatever the “new normal” brings. Based on fluctuations in New Jersey’s COVID-19 health data, the leadership of the college made the decision to continue conducting all classes online through the fall semester and intends to reevaluate the plan for the 2021 spring semester at a later date. With state-approved protocols in place regarding social distancing, capacity considerations, face coverings, and heightened cleaning, employees are now able to return to both campuses to keep vital services operational, while those who are able to perform their job functions remotely can do so in a combination of in-person and telecommuting designed to reduce overall campus population during this stage of The Road Back plan. Only classes that entail hands-on skill development as required by accrediting bodies and/or for credential completion are being offered in a hybrid format with a combination of online and face-to-face classes adhering to all mandated protocols.
Needless to say, how policy development and/or revisions are handled has changed dramatically. We were just getting started on collective policy review with our branch colleagues when the pandemic changed how we would proceed to conduct business. Understandably, most of our requests for policy assistance revolve around current policy revision and procedural addenda specifically related to the impact of COVID-19, which by necessity is a fluid process as existing mandates change in response to the pandemic situation.
In addition to keeping up with the evolving policy changes, our office was in the midst of completing the last aspects of our three-year strategic plan with an assortment of internal and external events planned. Like every in-person event or meeting planned across the college, everything became virtual almost overnight and old processes needed to be adapted quickly to work effectively in an online environment. After a bit of a virtual platform learning curve, many dropped calls, delayed internet audio and garbled responses, we have fortunately developed a sort of “new normal” rhythm, while at the same time, maintaining a sense of humor as dogs, cats or kids add their special magic to our work sessions. On a positive note, we were able to complete the strategic plan and it will head to the printer this week, and of course, our policy work continues.
As I reflect on where we were going into March and where we are now – it remains a huge challenge with plenty of uncertainty. However, I also marvel at what has been accomplished in the interim through sustaining open minds, the spirit of collaboration, respect, and no end of hard work.
Oh, and when we get to the other side of this pandemic, we will need to gather up all our notes and be poised and ready to overhaul our emergency operational plan to add a detailed section on global pandemics, while simultaneously pondering the “new normal” in which we find ourselves.
Tags:
change
Meg Resue
new normal
pandemic
policy
virtual meetings
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Jennifer Gallagher, Utah Valley University,
Tuesday, June 2, 2020
|
The "new normal": institutional policy changes in response to COVID-19
On Friday, March 6, 2020, my university announced that they were “closely monitoring the COVID-19 (coronavirus) outbreak domestically and internationally,” but that classes and business should continue as normal. This would be the first of many subsequent, almost daily, public announcements they would make in response to the pandemic. With every announcement came a new change: events modifications, travel restrictions, in-person meeting guidelines, class alterations, etc.
By Thursday, March 12, they had cancelled all in-person classes and moved most of their office workforce remote. All business travel was halted and all on-campus events cancelled. In the middle of spring semester, when the halls would normally be alive with thousands of students, faculty, staff, and visitors, Utah Valley University was a ghost town.
I don’t think any of us could have been fully prepared (both personally and on an institutional level) for the swift and stark snowball caused by COVID-19. Not only did it result in a rapid-fire of radical and necessary responses at the onset of the pandemic in March and continually since, but also will continue to transform the ways we live and work in the coming months as we transition into what public policy administrators are calling the “new normal.” But what does the “new normal” look like for your institution?
As college and university policy administrators, we are particularly concerned with keeping institutional action and response aligned with official policy and addressing policy gaps. Over the past few months, I have seen a number of such gaps in policies identified and addressed at my university (we even had to alter our policy that governs our university’s policy process to allow for extensions due to “extraordinary circumstances”). These policies were written in the BC (Before Coronavirus) time, when we were all a little more innocent and unaware that anything like this could happen. As such, our policies naturally do not account for changes caused by a world-wide pandemic.
As our institutions navigate this unprecedented new territory, what kind of policy changes have you seen motivated by the events of the recent months? Has your institution had to update travel policies to account for sudden travel restrictions, require travel disclosures, or impose other requirements? Have they had to alter events policies to address cancellations and extended periods of event blackouts? Will your institution require face masks in public areas, enforce social distancing, or impose other restrictions, andare these requirements aligned with their current policies? What about student health policies, work from home, classroom management, academic scheduling, grading, sick leave? The list is endless. No arena seems to be untouched by the implications of COVID-19 and the never-ending adjustments we make to navigate it. This is the New Normal. Let’s talk about it.
Tags:
change
coronavirus
covid-19
Jennifer Gallagher
open forum
policy change
Permalink
| Comments (2)
|
|
Posted By Teresa Raetz, Georgia Gwinnett College,
Monday, April 1, 2019
|
The Impact of Automation and AI
One aspect of my job is to research emerging issues for my campus and make recommendations for how we should be preparing for them. This post evolved from a policy and practice brief I recently wrote for my institution on the role of automation and artificial intelligence (AI) on the economy and the subsequent challenges for how we prepare students and operate as an organization.
While campus traditions and cultures vary, most of us have experienced—and currently work in—an educational system that prepares workers for an Industrial Revolution-based economy. Our modern economy, however, is changing in ways that will likely affect both the way we prepare students and our own workplaces; one of the drivers of that change is automation and AI.
Most people are familiar with the impact of automation on factory and blue-collar jobs that began to speed up in the 1970s. What many don’t appreciate is that increasing numbers of white-collar professions, such as radiology, accounting, stock trading, paralegal work, and even some aspects of journalism, have already been significantly influenced by machines that can do the work as effectively as humans.[i] Yes, some of the news stories you are currently reading are written by nonhumans. A 2013 Oxford University study predicted that nearly half of all jobs will be in danger of automation in the next two decades,[ii] and a 2015 McKinsey report predicted that 45% of all work can be automated by technology that’s currently available.[iii]A survey found that most researchers believe that AI systems will probably (i.e., more than 50% likelihood) achieve the ability to work at the same level as humans beginning around 2040.[iv] Even more moderate predictions see a large impact on the workplace, with 9% of the workforce being displaced.[v]
Skeptics say that the world economy has previously experienced several major technological disruptions—such as the power loom that displaced weavers and the car that eliminated most of the relevant products and services for horse-drawn carriages—and each time the economy recovered as people reskilled. Several experts say, however, that the disruption caused by AI is different because it is exponential in its ability to change and adjust.[vi]
Even if the more dire predictions don’t come to pass, it’s certain that AI and automation will impact our lives as workers, as well as those of our graduates. While it’s unlikely that instruction and service units will be completely automated, technology is currently in use that automates important functions like grading, tutoring, and answering basic inquiries from students.
Because so much is unknown about the impact of AI on education, there are more questions than answers at this point, but it’s important, nevertheless, that campuses begin to engage these coming changes and, as part of that process, give thoughtful consideration to what they mean for our own campuses as workplaces. Has your institution begun thinking about these issues? Has your institution begun using AI to perform functions that were previously done by humans, such as chatbots to answer basic student questions? In an era of scarce budget resources, what stance, if any, does your campus take on preserving the jobs of human workers versus using technology that can perform some or all of their functions?What policy and ethical implications do you foresee, as AI becomes more integrated into the work of education?
[ii] Frey, C. B. & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254 – 280.
[iv] Müller, V. & Bostrom, N. (2014). Future progress in artificial intelligence: A survey of expert opinion. In V. C. Müller (ed.), Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence (555 – 574). Berlin: Springer.
[v] Arntz, M. Gregory, T, & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 189. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
Tags:
AI
Artificial intelligence
automation
change
chatbot
workplace
Permalink
| Comments (1)
|
|