|
Posted By Jennifer Gallagher, Utah Valley University,
Tuesday, June 2, 2020
|
The "new normal": institutional policy changes in response to COVID-19
On Friday, March 6, 2020, my university announced that they were “closely monitoring the COVID-19 (coronavirus) outbreak domestically and internationally,” but that classes and business should continue as normal. This would be the first of many subsequent, almost daily, public announcements they would make in response to the pandemic. With every announcement came a new change: events modifications, travel restrictions, in-person meeting guidelines, class alterations, etc.
By Thursday, March 12, they had cancelled all in-person classes and moved most of their office workforce remote. All business travel was halted and all on-campus events cancelled. In the middle of spring semester, when the halls would normally be alive with thousands of students, faculty, staff, and visitors, Utah Valley University was a ghost town.
I don’t think any of us could have been fully prepared (both personally and on an institutional level) for the swift and stark snowball caused by COVID-19. Not only did it result in a rapid-fire of radical and necessary responses at the onset of the pandemic in March and continually since, but also will continue to transform the ways we live and work in the coming months as we transition into what public policy administrators are calling the “new normal.” But what does the “new normal” look like for your institution?
As college and university policy administrators, we are particularly concerned with keeping institutional action and response aligned with official policy and addressing policy gaps. Over the past few months, I have seen a number of such gaps in policies identified and addressed at my university (we even had to alter our policy that governs our university’s policy process to allow for extensions due to “extraordinary circumstances”). These policies were written in the BC (Before Coronavirus) time, when we were all a little more innocent and unaware that anything like this could happen. As such, our policies naturally do not account for changes caused by a world-wide pandemic.
As our institutions navigate this unprecedented new territory, what kind of policy changes have you seen motivated by the events of the recent months? Has your institution had to update travel policies to account for sudden travel restrictions, require travel disclosures, or impose other requirements? Have they had to alter events policies to address cancellations and extended periods of event blackouts? Will your institution require face masks in public areas, enforce social distancing, or impose other restrictions, andare these requirements aligned with their current policies? What about student health policies, work from home, classroom management, academic scheduling, grading, sick leave? The list is endless. No arena seems to be untouched by the implications of COVID-19 and the never-ending adjustments we make to navigate it. This is the New Normal. Let’s talk about it.
Tags:
change
coronavirus
covid-19
Jennifer Gallagher
open forum
policy change
Permalink
| Comments (2)
|
|
Posted By Megan Jones, Metropolitan State University of Denver,
Monday, April 13, 2020
|
Develop an interim policy process for extenuating circumstances
**The views expressed in this blog are my personal views and do not represent the official position of Metropolitan State University of Denver or ACUPA.**
When I drafted the expedited policy clause in Metropolitan State University of Denver’s “policy on policy,” which allows the MSU Denver president to enact interim policies “to address legal requirements or a significant institutional risk,” I did not have a worldwide, coronavirus pandemic in mind. However, as the daughter of two Vietnam vets and the wife of a military historian, I knew that an organizational threat might come from somewhere (or something) unexpected.
Balancing Inclusivity and Operational Effectiveness
MSU Denver’s policy process is designed to be inclusive and transparent. New and revised policies are reviewed by MSU Denver’s President’s Cabinet, by students and employees who serve on the Policy Advisory Council, by the shared governance groups, and by the university community at-large during an open review period. The inclusive process balances efficiency with effectiveness, in that publishing a policy quickly might not mean that a policy is communicated and implemented effectively.
Some circumstances, however, require quick, decisive action when it comes to policies. To address the current situation, MSU Denver’s leadership has instituted several interim policies related to moving courses online, working remotely, and allowing flexible grading options for students for the spring 2020 semester. Policies that were already in the works, such as a new social media policy, are still moving through the inclusive process, with meetings and document review occurring online.
Full Process
- Decision maker: Board of Trustees, president, or provost
- Review/Input:
- Board of Trustees (for governance policies)
- President’s Cabinet
- General counsel
- Policy Advisory Council
- Student Government Assembly
- Faculty and staff senates
- University community open comment period
- Ad hoc work groups based on expertise and operational area
- Documentation: Formal policy statement published online in University Policy Library
Interim Process
- Decision maker: President or provost
- Review/Input: Key constituents at president’s or provost’s discretion (in this case, a cross-functional taskforce, including the provost, general counsel, senior leadership team, and others was formed to address all things COVID-19)
- Documentation: Informal policy statements published online in the employee newsletter and MSU Denver’s COVID-19 Updates and Resources webpage
Staying Flexible
Including some flexibility in the policy process has saved me a great deal of stress during this time, as it allows me to focus on ongoing operations as senior leaders within the organization address current developments.
Tags:
coronavirus
covid-19
expedited policy
governance
inclusive
interim policy
Megan Jones
policy administration
policy change
policy process
process
risk management
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Teresa Raetz, Georgia Gwinnett College,
Monday, March 30, 2020
|
Keep policy work going while working from home
Many of us are involved to varying degrees with our respective institutional responses to the current coronavirus situation. In this week’s blog, I’d like to describe my experiences in the past couple of weeks and then open things up to your input.
Like so many others, my work routine changed rather quickly about two weeks ago, as the coronavirus situation began to expand and affect our state and institution. My campus, Georgia Gwinnett College, is located in the Atlanta metro. Our region has seen the highest rate of virus diagnoses in the state, simply due to more population density, about 6 million in Atlanta and suburbs. Decisions to suspend in-person classes, study abroad plans, and certain travel were made quickly by our state university system but each campus is also responding according to local needs and capabilities. As of March 16, only essential staff are on campus and most institutional effort has been focused on moving all classes and needed services online and transitioning students out of residential housing. Our residence halls remained technically open until yesterday, as plans were arranged for some students. I manage the institutional policy review and approval process, but not the policies themselves or compliance, so my role has been fairly minimal in the first two weeks. Buildings are mostly locked (although campus police will let you in if necessary), and the rest of us are working remotely. I’ve used the time to work on a variety of projects, including one for a new VP that was created BC (Before Coronavirus) to help her get up to speed on institutional policies and processes.
Communication is always essential, of course, but has become much more so recently. I have given thought to how (or even if) I should communicate to administrators about policies during this time. Normally, I send a weekly update to senior leadership and others with policy responsibilities, describing policy review activity, tips for good policy practice, and so on. I sent out a basic version in the first week just to maintain some hint of normalcy in a weird week, and last week, I added in a suggestion for using time working remotely to do policy work, along with reminders about tools to facilitate that. There are quite a few tasks that need to be done, such as formatting older policies in our current template, and they can be accomplished remotely, so all policy proponents have at least some policies they could address. I’ve already had an online meeting with one division’s policy team and I hope my nudge will encourage more to tackle policy projects, once the immediate needs associated with pandemic response are settled.
Because I’m a one-person office, my day-to-day work is relatively solitary and I have not found the transition to remote work too difficult, other than the need to address random questions and thoughts from my children, who are also home doing school work online. (My 13-year-old just asked me if I knew there is a penguin species that lives in the desert…science class research, apparently). After the first week of working just on my laptop, I went to my campus office over the weekend to retrieve some hardware, including my 39-inch monitor that helps me compare documents side-by-side. It’s invaluable in the office and even more so at home, even if it makes my dining room table/new office look like the bridge of the Enterprise. I’ve also received some in-the-moment training on using Microsoft Teams, which my colleagues are using for meetings. Georgia is blooming more each day and my family is taking a daily sanity walk, spring weather and pollen count allowing, while we maintain physical distancing, and I’m keeping the same daily routine, if somewhat more casually dressed, which I find helpful.
How has your work been affected as a result of coronavirus response? What role is policy playing in your campus’ response? Has the situation highlighted any strengths and/or weaknesses in your current policies? If you are working from home, what tips or discoveries can you share? How can we support you?
Tags:
coronavirus
covid-19
work remotely
Permalink
| Comments (4)
|
|