|
Posted By Meg Resue, Rowan College of South Jersey,
Monday, June 15, 2020
|
How COVID-19 complicated a college merger
Institutional change is hard and a gradual process is best accomplished through a series of baby steps taken over months or years to bring it to fruition. That said, Rowan College of South Jersey (RCSJ) has undergone extreme change on a short timeline, which defies my above logic but perhaps speaks to institutional resiliency.
RCSJ was established as a new institution with the Middle States Commission on Higher Education’s (MSCHE) approval on July 1, 2019. The merger joined two community colleges from two counties into one, with the caveat MSCHE would be back in approximately six months to assess if headway was being made based on the original substantive change request information. A few of areas the MSCHE team would review when they returned to campus were policy development progress, institutional effectiveness, and strategic planning development. All of these areas fall within the President’s Office under the Institutional Policy umbrella.
The Institutional Policy Office in the interim has made progress in these three areas. Policies were systematically reviewed with stakeholder meetings held on both campuses, the practice of electronic review and tracking of revisions continued, and the policy library was maintained. Work has begun and continues on aligning the two campuses’ institutional effectiveness practices. And finally, a timeline and strategy to implement a three-year strategic plan process was developed in October 2019, the initial kick-off took place in November 2019, which started a cascade of in-person meetings over the next several months, with the final product ready to present to the RCSJ Board of Trustees pinned down to June or July 2020.
Seven months into the merger, MSCHE did return for a review site visit on March 10, 2020. While preparations for this visit were underway, the day prior to MSCHE’s arrival, the State of New Jersey’s Governor issued both a Public Health Emergency and a State of Emergency Executive Order due to the COVID-19 outbreak. This was followed by another Executive Order on March 16, suspending all face-to-face instruction effective March 18. The following week the college was closed for spring break. This break was when faculty and staff shifted a two-campus commuter college, accustomed to in-person delivery, to an entirely online delivery more than mid-way through the college’s spring semester and strategized how to effectively and immediately communicate this abrupt change to the student body. No small feat, as others I am certain can attest.
New Jersey, with its close proximation to New York City, was significantly impacted by the pandemic, exerting huge financial implications for businesses, schools, and residents. Subsequently, the governor on March 21 issued Executive Order 107 directing all New Jersey residents to stay at home until further notice. At the time of this writing, the State of New Jersey is re-opening in phases; I and my colleagues remain working from home as higher education has not been released to return to work. All summer session classes and student support services will continue to be provided online --- not ideal, but doable.
From a policy stand point, all policy work was already done electronically, so no problem there. What has been unfortunate is the abrupt move from face-to-face meetings with policy owners to a web-based format with frustratingly poor connectivity at times, particularly when our two campuses are in the midst of building rapport and a collaborative foundation. In addition, due to the pandemic, the alignment of institutional effectiveness is now on hold until we can return to campus, and the last two in-person dinner meetings to review the strategic plan’s finalized goals and objectives with the internal and external constituent groups were forced by necessity to an online format. The strategic plan final draft is complete and ready for presentation at our virtual board meeting in July.
We live in a new era of complexities that will certainly define a new normal and change our practices socially, personally, and professionally. We are in the center of a perfect storm with a trifecta of pressures converging: the rising anxiety and stress due to escalating coronavirus deaths, massive unemployment generating financial insecurity, and the disturbing recent events calling forth understandable nation-wide civil unrest. These are difficult times and as educators we face many daunting challenges, but we are also positioned to make things better by showing understanding and respect for all.
To end on a positive note, out of darkness comes a sliver of light. Remember the strategic plan I mentioned was about to be published? This document will now have a companion piece that will be a strategic diversity, equity, and inclusion action plan and will serve as its foundation. It may even preface the overarching strategic plan with a “holding a space” notation within for a future insertion. That is what I would call “belt and suspenders”! The design has and will now become the talk of many of our future virtual meetings. And let’s not forget policy work that is tethered tightly to the strategic plan. Our important work goes on. The storm will clear.
A better way is on its way.
Stay well --- stay healthy.
Tags:
challenges
COVID-19
Meg Resue
pandemic
policy administration
strategic planning
Permalink
| Comments (0)
|
|
Posted By Margaret Denton, Kaiser Permanente School of Medicine,
Monday, February 17, 2020
|
The special sauce in policy development
Often organizations want to build a strong policy development process, but struggle on identifying the how. My institution initiated a plan to develop a formal policy program based on our first policy on policies (POP). We went through various program designs, sponsors, and stops and starts. Until a project manager (PM) was assigned, developing clearly defined next steps (who, when, what, and why) was a challenge. Our PM helped us develop a well-defined process with the following steps.
Project Management Process
Step 1: Identify the goal of the project.At the planning stage (following a presidential charge to develop a POP), our PM worked with the team to answer fundamental project management questions: What are you hoping to achieve? How will we measure that? What does success look like? After numerous planning meetings, we were able to identify our policy goals: 1) establish a university-wide policy review process to ensure strong guidelines to comply with internal processes and external regulations and 2) standardize the format and essential elements of all policies.
Step 2: Map out the scope.Our scope included an approval process to arrive at a new policy, the procedures, the marketing effort, committee structure, policy writers, comment period, and decision makers. Our PM made sure our project scope included the deliverables and the timeline for those deliverables.
Step 3: Develop a full outline. Your institution’s culture dictates this next step. Should the process begin all at once, a measured socialization process; or a slow rollout or some-type of hybrid? For us, the timeline addressed each area identified in our scope: policy (interim vs permanent), the procedures (public or internal), the marketing effort (website design, communication channels, and presentations), committee structure, policy writers, comment period, and decision-makers.
Step 4: Finalize your plan. All steps in the plan must be clearly identified and developed into a defined timeline. Our plan had to be vetted not only among the policy working group and concerned stakeholders, but also the senior sponsors to the program. Failure to keep all members involved in the final plan would inevitably guarantee a slowdown in progress.
Our Lessons Learned
- Change is inevitable. Do not be afraid to readjust your plan. At our initial request, the PM designed the plan relying upon our request to work with a slow rollout in the hope we could gently socialize the process to all the stakeholders. However, this process created confusion and pushback in an uninformed manner. With the support of our PM, we were able to pivot to a full-roll out and we managed to get the project back on track quickly.
- Avoid scope creep. Stick to the goals as set by the project management plan. One thing our PM consistently reminded the group: no scope creep! There is always lots to do. Ideally, the team should document the additional needs and schedule time/people to address independently of the current plan. At times, your project scope may change and/or expand. Revisit your plan from the top and adjust all steps accordingly.
- Manage the delays. Delays may not be avoidable, but lapses in communications are avoidable. Our implementation rollout plan included a revamp of the location and look of the university policies, which resulted in a significant loss of time due to changes in team personnel. However, at all times, we kept the stakeholders and participants (e.g., marketing department, IT team) apprised of changes in the timelines.
- Practice makes perfect. Recognize the need to spend time expounding the new process with the decision-makers and with those who will be tasked to employ the new policy regularly. Although the new process was reviewed and approved by the President’s Cabinet, we underestimated the need to “walk through” the first few policies. This caused a setback in comprehension and adoption as policy approvals inadvertently drifted back to prior processes.
- Conduct a project postmortem. Assess how the policy development went from start to finish, including any bumps in the road you experienced. Did it run on schedule? If not, did you readjust/get back on schedule? What caused the delay? What would you change for the next policy rollout? Were there any major wins/lessons learned that will significantly impact your next policy rollout? You should also compare how your results fared with your initial plan. By taking this time to reflect, you will all but guarantee that your next policy under development doesn’t fall victim to the same mistakes.
Tags:
Margaret Denton
policy process
project management
strategic planning
Permalink
| Comments (2)
|
|
Posted By Teresa Raetz, Georgia Gwinnett College,
Monday, October 7, 2019
|
Policy, Strategic Planning, and the Future Adventures of an Enterprise Risk Management Newbie
I am the policy manager for my campus, and I am organizationally housed within a department called Plans, Policies, and Analysis. The unit includes the traditional institutional effectiveness functions, including academic and co-curricular assessment, institutional strategic planning, and, of course, policy process management. My role within my department is to manage the institutional policy review process, but I have no role with managing the policies themselves (other than our own departmental policies). Despite the clear boundaries around my responsibilities, I have arguably the widest view of policies on our campus—which policies we have and how they relate—since I work with all of them.
Because of this broad policy view, I was recently asked to represent my department on my college’s Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Committee. While I am generally familiar with ERM, I have not been part of any ERM activities before, so my first action, after asking a few questions and receiving the committee charter, was to dive deeper into the role of policy in ERM, so that I can attend my first meeting well prepared.
My role on this committee hasn’t really begun yet, but for now, I believe that it will be to articulate risks, as they arise, that are created by extant policy or the absence of policy. Because my unit drives institutional strategic planning, my role will also be to identify and articulate risks associated with our strategic plan and its processes. According to Deloitte, these include risks that inform the strategic plan (such as legislation that could alter our activities), risks to the implementation of the plan itself (such as imminent budget cuts), and risks created by the plan. An example of the latter could be creating a strategic priority around moving data to the cloud, which would create some risk around security of the data.
One of the things I’m most looking forward to is working with campus leadership in a slightly different capacity. I currently work with a wide swath of administrators and staff through the policy editing and review process. They know me as the person who provides training for policy processes and best practices and the editor of individual policy changes. My role on the ERM committee will be more analytical and broad-based, as we work together to identify risks and prioritize the amount of risk they present. Another thing I’m looking forward to is the opportunity to “sit at the top of the mountain” and further my understanding of how key institutional processes work together to feed the success of the college. I’m a bit of an organizational development nerd, so I’m sure I will find it fascinating to learn more about how the strategic plan, institutional policy, and the various parts of ERM work together (or, don’t, eek!).
What experiences have you had with ERM? What advice or resources can you share that have been helpful to you in risk management? In your current role, do you identify policy risks, either inside a risk management structure or more informally? What do you do to increase the chance that these concerns are responded to?
Tags:
ERM
risk management
strategic planning
Permalink
| Comments (4)
|
|