Policy Matters
Blog Home All Blogs
Administered by the Blog Committee, Policy Matters posts are written by members on a variety of topics. From think pieces to how-to's, editorials to news round-ups, there is something for every policy administrator. Interested in contributing a post? Let us know by emailing admin@acupa.org.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: policy  policy development  Policy Administration  Jessica Teets  policy process  collaboration  Deborah Bartlett  pandemic  accessibility  COVID-19  Jennifer Gallagher  Gina Kennedy  writing  ACUPA  data  equity  IT  Productivity  remote work  How-to  Lisa Biagas  news  resources  Sara Gigeroff  students  AI  change  compliance  culture  free speech 

Protecting Outdoor Workers During Smoke Events

Posted By Deborah Bartlett, Washington State University, Monday, September 16, 2024
Updated: Friday, September 13, 2024

Considerations for Worker Safety


Many of you are now regularly dealing with wildfire smoke—another byproduct of rapidly changing climate conditions. For those who live and work in the western or northern U.S. and Canada, smoke is certainly now a regular part of our reality during the dry summer and early fall months, and is an issue that many other locations are also experiencing.

Smoke from wildfires is a mixture of gases and fine particulates that can be harmful to the health of many individuals. The state of Washington's Department of Labor and Industries (L&I) recently mandated the implementation of safety policies to protect those who must work outdoors during smoke events.

My institution, Washington State University (WSU), published our Working During Wildfire Smoke Events policy in April 2024 in our administrative Safety Policies and Procedures Manual. I thought I'd share some of the requirements that L&I asked us to include, along with those WSU decided to also implement, for your consideration.

What are the Definitions of Any Technical Terms Involved?

As with many safety and technical related policies, there's industry terminology that it's advisable to define for users who are new to the subject. We found two terms, “air quality index (AQI)” and “particulate matter 2.5 (PM 2.5),” that needed definitions to increase clarity.

"Air quality index" communicates air quality for several pollutants, including PM 2.5. PM 2.5 measures the amount of solid particles and liquid droplets suspended in the air in micrograms per cubic meter.

Who's Responsible and What are They Responsible For?

State regulations specify required actions when wildfire smoke affects outdoor air quality at five different AQI values and action levels. WSU had to determine which administrative offices would be responsible for managing and performing the various actions needed to deal with smoke events:

  • Campus Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) offices: Monitoring air quality; notifying departments/units, workers, and students by email of air quality risks; and providing applicable information resources.
  • Campus Facilities Services offices: Operating facility heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems to reduce indoor PM 2.5 concentrations whenever feasible; work with building occupants to keep all windows, doors, and other exterior openings closed as much as possible.
  • Research and Extension Centers (RECs): Notifying REC facilities, farms, and workers of air quality, risks, and applicable information resources.
  • Departments/Units: Enforcing the policy; establishing effective methods of communicating air quality risk notifications to workers who don't have access to email.

What Actions are Required?

Departments and units with outdoor workers are required to encourage workers to report worsening air quality, report on their own and other workers' possible symptoms of wildfire smoke exposure, and seek medical attention as needed without fear of retaliation.

As smoke levels increase, the different PM 2.5 concentrations require different levels of response. The policy outlines the various PM 2.5 concentration levels and the responses—from providing N95 masks for voluntary use, to requiring distribution of N95s to workers, to requiring the use of full powered air purifiers (which requires another level of fit-testing and training).

Why is Wildfire Smoke Exposure a Concern?

We decided that providing a description of the health effects of wildfire smoke exposure would help to emphasize the seriousness of these events and fully inform WSU community members, and especially those who work outdoors, of the risks involved.

General symptoms which may be related to smoke exposure include, but are not limited to, cough, irregular heartbeat, headache, scratchy eyes, and fatigue. These symptoms are uncomfortable but not necessarily life-threatening.

We also provide a list of symptoms that require immediate medical attention, including but not limited to, symptoms indicating possible heart attacks, breathing difficulties, asthma attacks, and nausea or vomiting.

Creating Your Own Policy

Every institution handles worker safety issues differently, but it's a good idea to formalize policies for protecting the health of our employees, students, and volunteers in as many of the situations they'll encounter as possible. I hope what I've shared from the WSU perspective helps you start or continue your own conversations about developing or revising a safety policy at your institution for those working outdoors during smoke events.

Tags:  ACUPA  air quality index  AQI  considerations  Deborah Bartlett  health effects  health risks  N95  N95s  particulate matter  particulate matter 2.5  PM 2.5  policy  respirator  risk  risk management  risk management software  smoke  smoke exposure  smoke hazards  tools  wildfire smoke 

Permalink
 

Managing Risk for Your Enterprise

Posted By Deborah Bartlett, Washington State University, Monday, October 9, 2023
Updated: Friday, October 6, 2023

Risk Management Policy Considerations

Identifying, minimizing, and controlling exposures to loss are important functions for all institutions.  Most of you have already implemented a risk management policy for your college or university, or are in the process of developing or updating one.

My institution, Washington State University (WSU), published an administrative Policy on Risk Management (EP6) in January 2019.  In August 2023, we finalized a revision to EP6 which included a number of new approaches for overseeing this process that I thought I'd share for your consideration.

Enterprise Type—Campus or System

WSU has multiple campuses in various parts of the state, plus an online (global) campus.  For many years, our Pullman campus was our main administrative hub.  A few years ago, the administration decided to move to a systemwide management model, with each campus, including our flagship Pullman campus, led by a separate campus chancellor, who in turn reports to our system president. 

Some administrative functions are best served by specific campus oversight, and some are best served by systemwide oversight.  International standards encourage an enterprise (systemwide) approach to risk management.  WSU follows International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 31000: 2018—Risk Management Guidelines to identify potential obstacles or occurrences that could threaten an enterprise's ability to meet its mission and goals.

Enterprise Risk Management Software

The state of Washington also encourages an enterprise approach to risk management by state agencies, of which WSU is one.  To facilitate this, the Washington Department of Enterprise Services (DES) provides software modules to the risk management offices at all state agencies to assist with risk identification and rating, risk controls, and planning for managing risks.  The software that DES selected to distribute is the Origami risk management information system. The software platform integrates insurance, risk, safety, and compliance solutions.

I found this addition to our policy rather fascinating, as I'm a fan of tech solutions.  Since the software is distributed directly to our RM office only, little direct information was put into our executive policy.  If you're interested in investigating this further, go to the link above to get more information from the manufacturer's website.

Administrative Oversight

WSU decided to implement a four-level approach to administrative oversight of risk management:

  1. Risk Management Executive Committee (RMEC):  RMEC is a presidential committee that provides executive oversight for enterprise and operational risk. It oversees the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process. RMEC also provides guidance to the Risk Management Advisory Group (RMAG) and Risk Management (RM) office.
  2. Risk Management Advisory Group (RMAG): RMAG is appointed by our Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration. Its membership is representative of system units engaged in daily risk management. Units may request to join RMAG through the Risk Management Office.
  3. Risk Management Office (RM): The RM office at WSU is a part of Compliance and Risk Management under Finance and Administration. RM coordinates and evaluates the risk management program for the WSU system and has responsibility and authority in four primary areas:
    • Risk awareness, assessment, and assistance services to units and personnel;
    • Coordination of systemwide risk committees;
    • Managing and administering insurance coverages and related services to units; and,
    • Reporting risks, accidents, injuries, liabilities, and other risk management activities to university departments and applicable state and federal agencies.

  4. Individuals and Units: Individual employees, departments, and units are responsible for taking steps to reduce the risk of injury and accidental loss to the greatest extent possible, consistent with carrying out the institution's mission and goals. RM is available to provide assistance to individuals and units, as needed.

Every institution handles risk management processes differently, but as we've all found, it is a good idea to formalize a policy for managing risks.  I hope what I've shared from the WSU perspective helps you start or continue your own conversations about developing or revising risk management at your institution.

Tags:  ACUPA  considerations  Deborah Bartlett  developing policy  enterprise  enterprise risk management  ERM  ERM software  ISO 31000  Origami  Origami Risk  oversight  risk  risk management  risk management software  tools 

PermalinkComments (0)