Policy Matters
Blog Home All Blogs
Administered by the Blog Committee, Policy Matters posts are written by members on a variety of topics. From think pieces to how-to's, editorials to news round-ups, there is something for every policy administrator. Interested in contributing a post? Let us know by emailing admin@acupa.org.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: policy  policy development  Policy Administration  Jessica Teets  policy process  collaboration  Deborah Bartlett  pandemic  accessibility  COVID-19  Jennifer Gallagher  Gina Kennedy  writing  ACUPA  data  equity  IT  Productivity  remote work  How-to  Lisa Biagas  news  resources  Sara Gigeroff  students  AI  change  compliance  culture  free speech 

Is Your Policy Library Bursting at the Seams?

Posted By Jessica Teets CCEP, Purdue University, Monday, September 11, 2023
Updated: Wednesday, September 6, 2023

When to Get Rid of a Policy

Is there such a thing as too many policies? How many is enough? The answers to these questions vary by institution and depend on the type of college, how many students attend, whether research is conducted, how many campuses make up the university, and what fields of study are offered. A commonality among all institutions, regardless of demographics, is the purpose policies serve. Some policies fulfill a legal, accrediting, or agency requirement, which means they need to remain in your library for as long as the requirement is in place. Other policies provide consistency in the way a particular issue is managed or addressed across the institution. Policies that fit this description help the college/university community know what to expect, regardless of their role. Lastly, policies may be used to manage enterprise-wide risks or operational efficiencies. When you need to get everyone on the same page, a policy can serve as the source document for stipulating conditions, limitations, and authority for making decisions.

Policies are meant to be read and used. A library that has so many policies that the common user doesn’t know where to start is not very useful. When a policy is read only by the office that wrote it, the message isn’t conveyed to the people who need it.

Most policy programs include a review cycle every three to five years to ensure that policies stay current. Consider including the option to eliminate a policy as part of that review. A few reasons that may warrant the withdrawal of a policy include:

  1. A history of making exceptions to the policy;
  2. Provisions that are tied to the availability of funds, meaning that individual offices and departments choose whether or not to utilize the policy;
  3. Stipulations that are optional;
  4. Requirements that are not value-added, and may go so far as to present an administrative burden; or
  5. Conditions that are contrary to your institution’s culture and/or mission.

When you come across a policy that meets one or more of the above, it may mean that the policy needs to be reworked. For example, eligibility requirements may need to be changed or some of the limitations may need to be lifted. But it might also mean that you don’t need the policy at all. Don’t be afraid to toss it out.

Tags:  Jessica Teets  policy review 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Choose Your Words Carefully

Posted By Jessica Teets CCEP, Purdue University, Tuesday, January 11, 2022
Updated: Tuesday, January 11, 2022

Seemingly Similar Words Can Be Very Different

Policies would not exist without someone to write them. That may or may not be your responsibility. Once they’re written, they need to be reviewed—for content, accuracy, use of template, comprehension, and grammar. If you are involved in policy administration, some aspect of review is bound to be your responsibility. My job affords me the opportunity to both write and review policies to one degree or another, so I see examples of good writing and not so good writing all the time. A common mistake I see when reviewing policy drafts is using one word to mean another. Let me explain what I mean…

Ensure/Insure

These two words used to be synonyms. However, sometime in the 1800s, as insurance policies became more common, the definitions diverged.

  • Insure means to have some kind of financial backing for the potential loss of an asset, your health or life, etc. It should only be used when referring to insurance.
  • Ensure means to make a promise or guarantee that something will happen.
  • Examples:
    1. The real estate agent recommended we insure our barn.
    2. The vice president for human resources will ensure that background checks are conducted on all new hires.

Since/Because

Most people say the word “since” when they mean because. For this reason, acceptance of the two words as synonyms in dialogue is growing. However, when writing formal documents like policies, the difference between the words should be recognized.

  • Since refers to a period of time between two events or from the last occurrence of an event.
  • Because refers to the reason for something happening.
  • Examples:
    1. Since the last time employees had training, the regulations changed.
    2. Because the regulations changed, employees will be required to go through training.

That/Which

The difference between these two words often comes down to a comma. Both are used to provide further explanation of something, but one is used when the explanation is essential to the understanding of what is being described, and the other provides nonessential information.

  • Use that when the information is essential, and do not use a comma.
  • Use which when the information is nonessential, and put a comma before it.
  • Examples:
    1. Information Technology is responsible for maintaining the system that employees use to submit travel requests.
      In this sentence, without the information after the word “that,” IT would not know which system it has to maintain.
    2. Employees must use the travel system, which is maintained by Information Technology, to submit travel requests.
      In this sentence, who maintains the system is irrelevant to the employee’s understanding of how to submit requests.

He/She/They

This is another example of language changing with culture. Once upon a time, we used “one” as the pronoun for anyone. “He” also was acceptable as a less formal option to refer to persons of any sex. As times changed, and women demanded more equality, we began to use “he or she” or “he/she.” As Bob Dylan sang, “the times they are a-changin’” once again, and a more inclusive pronoun is “they.” However, many grammar wonks are not comfortable using a plural pronoun when the noun it describes is singular. Here are some options that may help make everyone happy.

  • Use the word “individuals”
    1. Instead of: An employee must include their date of hire on the form.
    2. Write: Individuals must include their date of hire on the form.
  • Omit unnecessary pronouns
    1. Instead of: The vice president, or their delegate, will review the application.
    2. Write: The vice president, or designee, will review the application.
  • Restructure the sentence
    1. Instead of: When the employee returns from leave, they will need to provide documentation to their supervisor.
    2. Write: Employees need to provide documentation to their supervisors upon returning from leave.

Word usage and the ever-changing rules that apply to the English language fascinate me. Language is a living, breathing organism that grows and morphs as culture demands. This can make it difficult to keep up with the rules. Are there any examples you have come across in your work?

Tags:  editing  Jessica Teets  policy review  Word tips  wordingg  writing 

PermalinkComments (1)