Policy Matters
Blog Home All Blogs
Administered by the Blog Committee, Policy Matters posts are written by members on a variety of topics. From think pieces to how-to's, editorials to news round-ups, there is something for every policy administrator. Interested in contributing a post? Let us know by emailing admin@acupa.org.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: policy  policy development  Policy Administration  Jessica Teets  policy process  collaboration  Deborah Bartlett  pandemic  accessibility  COVID-19  Jennifer Gallagher  Gina Kennedy  writing  ACUPA  data  equity  IT  Productivity  remote work  How-to  Lisa Biagas  news  resources  Sara Gigeroff  students  AI  change  compliance  culture  free speech 

Increase Awareness of and Participation in Policy Development

Posted By Deborah Bartlett, Washington State University, Monday, January 9, 2023
Updated: Friday, January 6, 2023

Implementing a "Policy on Policies"

If you've been in the policy administration business for any length of time, you've likely heard about, considered, and/or implemented a "policy on policies" at your institution. For those of you who don't already publish such a policy, I thought I'd discuss why I believe that it's a valuable tool to have in place.

Policy development is an important function, but getting administrative buy-in and notice of the importance of consistent policy development and tracking is sometimes difficult. Having a "policy on policies" provides an agreed-upon process for developing, reviewing, and approving policies, and ensures better compliance with the rules, regulations, and agreements that govern the business of higher education.

Here are some things to consider when creating or updating a policy on policies at your institution:

  • Applicability
  • Equity Review
  • Required Policy Review and Approval Steps
  • Templates or Framework

I'm also providing brief descriptions below of how we've chosen to handle these considerations here at Washington State University (WSU).

Applicability

Do you want a policy on policies that applies to all or only some policies?

At WSU, as with many public research universities, we have many types of institution-wide policy publications in place -- administrative policy manuals, academic policies and procedures, personnel manuals, research-related manuals, and our Washington Administrative Code (WAC) regulations.

When we first published an executive policy on policies, our administration decided to apply it to all policies except academic and single-unit or single-campus policies and procedures. The policy at that time outlined a draft/review/approval process that all policy publication departments were required to follow. Our policy on policies was revised recently to apply only to policies intended for publication in the four administrative policy manuals and the WAC regulations, which are managed by my office.

Equity Review

Do you want to include an equity review requirement in your policy on policies?

Our administration, including academic leadership, recently approved an equity review process, which includes an equity lens tool. My office agreed to publish the equity lens tool from our new Policy Development website, and to include discussion of the required process in the policy on policies.

Equity lens review includes review and approval both during the policy discussion phase and during the formal drafting and review phase of policy development.

And in the interest of increasing transparency and WSU community input, our Policy Development website includes descriptions of administrative policies under development and copies of drafts of the policies under review. (Copies of administrative policy drafts are available to WSU members only.) Copies of proposed WAC amendments continue to be published through the Washington State Register (WSR), and our Proposed WACs website links to the WSR proposals and public hearing information.

Required Policy Review and Approval Steps

Do you want to include specific actions for policy developers to complete when requesting new or revised policies, or removing policies? Do you want to have separate processes for major revisions and minor revisions?

In order to ensure that steps such as conducting the equity review, involving my office (for preparation and process oversight), and obtaining approvals from necessary administrators are completed, we decided to include step-by-step process instructions in our updated policy on policies. Our administration agreed to allow an abbreviated approval process for minor revisions.

Our policy on policies also includes periodic review requirements. For the most part it was decided to make the applicable administrative departments responsible for periodic review, as my office has a very limited staff (just two of us).

Template or Framework

Do you want your policy developers to use a template, or will you provide a policy framework to them for reference?

As I wrote in a previous blog a year or so back, we had for many years not required templates for policy development, but instead provided framework recommendations upon request. However, our compliance administration decided to implement a template for our executive policies and a template for our business and safety policies and procedures. (Links to these policy templates are available from our Policy Development website In the interest of moving forward with the updated policy on policies requirements as soon as possible, we have not applied the templates to our existing policies, but plan to restructure our policies as revisions occur. (Again, this is mainly due to staffing limitations and workload.)

In conclusion, if you haven't already implemented a "policy on policies," I highly recommend doing so. Having one in place greatly assists both policy developers and members of the policy administration office, by providing readily-accessible guidance and structure.

Note to ACUPA Members

Be sure to look at the ACUPA Templates and Other Tools webpage for samples to use to guide policy development, revision, review, and removal. These templates, guides, and tools have been developed from samples provided by policy administrators at multiple institutions and can be invaluable resources.

Tags:  Deborah Bartlett  equity lens  equity review  Policy Development  policy on policies  policy process  template 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Policy Development – Are Templates Required?

Posted By Deborah Bartlett, Washington State University, Monday, February 14, 2022
Updated: Friday, February 11, 2022

Framework Recommendations Instead of Templates


In conversations and webinars with other policy administrators, the debate about whether or not to use templates for writing and developing policies continually comes up. A number of institutions mandate the use of one or more templates for their users who want to develop policy and/or procedures documents.

I've worked for the past 25 years in the administrative policies office for Washington State University. We've chosen not to use a template for developing the administrative policies and/or procedures our office publishes. We do have a style guide, but it’s mostly involved with formatting and layout so that sections and policies have a uniform “look.” Our choice has predominantly been based on the idea of providing flexibility to our subject expert departments as they update or add new sections to our long-established administrative policy manuals.

In accordance with WSU's executive Policy on Policies (EP5), departments may begin development of their administrative policy/procedure rough drafts prior to bringing my office into the process or may request our assistance with developing the drafts from the beginning. As subject expert administrators get started, we do occasionally get requests for policy framework guidance from those who are new to policy writing and development.

Here’s a general outline that my office recommends for writing a new policy or policy/procedure section for placement in one of our administrative manuals:

  • Overview and/or Policy Statement

    It’s sometimes useful to have both. If a section is especially long, placing a set of links to subsections in the document in the overview can be useful. For examples, see the beginnings of WSU's policy sections EP8 and EP38.

    In a section that's predominantly procedural, an overview might be more appropriate as a place to provide a summary of or references to the applicable policy.

  • Purpose

    A purpose statement provides a brief description of the purpose of the policy and/or activity. In some cases, a purpose statement is provided in an overview or policy statement.

  • Scope

    A scope statement describes the limitations or boundaries of the policy/procedure. Some writers choose to combine scope statements/subsections in either an overview or policy statement or within an applicability statement.

  • Applicability

    An applicability statement or subsection describes the members of the institution's community (internal and/or external) directly impacted by the policy and/or expected to follow the policy/procedures.

  • Roles and Responsibilities

    Roles and responsibilities statements provide a summary of the actions and/expectations each employee or role category is expected to fulfill with relation to the policy/procedures.

  • Requirements

    Policy requirements are provided in this subsection. If procedures are included, any required procedural steps would be provided in the order the actions are to occur.

  • Procedures (if applicable)

    Some institutions choose to keep policies and procedures separate. At WSU, we have quite a number of combined policy and procedures sections in our administrative manuals. For the most part, we recommend publishing procedures and policy/procedures within our business and safety manuals. However, we do have a small number of executive policies in which the executive administrators insisted upon including both policies and procedures.

  • Definitions

    We recommend providing definitions applicable to the policy/procedures in their own subsection, especially if terms are used that are specific to a subject and/or include jargon. If there are only one or two terms that need to be defined, the definitions may be included directly with the reference.

    If this subsection is short, it might be placed after the applicability statement. However, if the definitions list is longer than a page, we often recommend placing the subsection at or near the end and providing an internal document link and/or reference, if needed, earlier in the policy.

  • Additional Resources
    An additional resources subsection provides descriptions or lists and references (e.g., website URLs) including, but not limited to, supporting department contacts, state and federal agencies' websites, other supporting or related institutional policies and procedures.

Every policy office and institution handles their policy development process differently, and there's really no right or wrong answer. Does your institution mandate policy/procedure templates? Or make framework recommendations? Things to consider for both you and your users…

NOTE: ACUPA members have access to a number of resources, including templates, samples, and other tools that you may find useful in writing and developing your policies and procedures. To access the Templates and Tools under the Resources tab, sign in as a member.

Tags:  ACUPA  Deborah Bartlett  developing policies  framework  outline  policies and procedures  policy design  policy development  policy/procedures  recommendations  resources  samples  template  templates  tools  writing 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Are Your Policies Accessible?

Posted By Jennifer Gallagher, Utah Valley University, Monday, December 2, 2019

Part 3: Automating Accessibility in Custom Word Templates

Note: This post is a beginner-intermediate tutorial and assumes you already know how to save and edit a document in Word for use as a custom template file (.dotx). For a beginner’s guide to saving a document as a template see Microsoft’s “Create a Template” tutorial. Additionally, this post is tailored specifically for PCs with Office 365, though most should be applicable for MAC use, as well as older versions of Word.

One of the challenges of producing accessible policy documents for digital use is ensuring the continual consistency and uniformity of those documents throughout the many stages of policy. In a previous post, I discussed how the tedious and ongoing repair and upkeep of our templates, as they passed through the hands and computers of different policy writers, was costing our office a lot of valuable time. In this post, I’m going to show you some of the ways we’ve been able to harness some of Word’s advanced templating features to mitigate user error, automate institutional and accessibility standards, and save our office a lot time by eliminating the same repetitive fixes.

Create Uniform Styles

Creating styles is the easiest way to save time and energy for both you and your users. Any time text or formatting is modified from the standard paragraph text (even just bolded or resized), it should be assigned to an existing style or a new one created. The biggest mistake Word users make is formatting text outside of a style. This is important for both accessibility and elimination of user error. Every time text is formatted outside of a named style, those alterations are coded into the text, making it more difficult to convert to other formats (PDF, HTML, etc.), while also making it a nightmare for screen readers.

Most Microsoft Word users know that Word comes preloaded with their own styles, and if you’ve been following along with my posts on accessibility, you know that using them is a requirement for the creation of accessible documents. However, most casual users are not aware that these styles can be modified and used to act and look however you want them to. In addition, when you create a template (.dotx or .dotm) from a Word document, if done correctly, those styles will appear within the template for use by anyone with the template file.

Whether you’re modifying a current template file or creating a new one, you can alter the styles to meet your aesthetic needs while adhering to accessibility best practices (just be sure your custom styles meet WCAG’s standards on font, size, contrast, and color).

Updating Styles

If your template is already created, you can use the pre-existing text to quickly update Microsoft’s pre-programmed styles to mimic your template’s design. If you’re creating a new template, simply format the text exactly how you want the headings and other elements in your template to look. Then determine the hierarchy of formatted text in your template, keeping in mind that anything formatted differently than paragraph text should be assigned a style. (Remember to assign headings based on WCAG’s standards, and never, ever, skip levels).

To assign a text’s properties to a style, click on any part of that text and then right-click the applicable style in the styles ribbon. Select “Update Heading to Match Selection” from the pop-up menu (see image below). Doing this tells Words to copy all the properties of the selected text (font name, size, boldness; bolding or italics; paragraph spacing, indenting, alignment; formatting; etc.) to the style. Now, rather than a screen reader reading aloud those properties in lengthy detail, it will simply announce it by its selected header tag, which also notifies the reader of its importance within the document.

an image showing readers where the

Follow this step for all your headings and any other formatted elements, and don’t forget to modify the paragraph style to match your template’s paragraph style if it deviates from Microsoft’s default programming.

Note: In Office 365, only heading 1 and 2 are shown by default; however, when you assign text to heading 2, heading 3 is revealed, and so on as each heading is assigned.

Altering Style Settings

If you follow the instructions above, you should be able to easily make and use styles within your current document. However, if you want your styles to persist and be accessible within the template file itself on any computer by anyone with the template file, you need to take one more step.

With each style you modify, right click on its name in the styles ribbon and select “Modify.”

an image showing where the

In this menu, you are able to alter any of the properties of the style, including its name, paragraph options, effects, bordering, etc. But the most important setting for templating is to ensure that both “Add to the Styles gallery” and “New documents based on this template” are checked (as shown below).

Microsoft Word's modify style setting option menu

Don’t forget to save your document as a template file afterward.

Any time a document is created from that template file, it will contain its assigned and customized styles, eliminating the need for tedious and repetitive formatting, and reducing user error from manual formatting. However, to really restrict users from inadvertently muddying your template, you’re going to want to lock down the styles they’re allowed to use, freeing them from the pesky confusion of choice and giving you supreme template control, which I will discuss in a future post.

More Information

This post is part of an ongoing series on web accessibility and Microsoft Word optimization. For further training, see my previous posts (Word Tips one and two, and part one and part two of my series on accessibility.) 

I hope you are finding these posts informative and applicable with your role in policy administration. As usual, let me know in the comments below what questions you may have, topics you would like to see addressed in future posts, challenges you face in regards to document or template creation, or any other suggestions you have to help me tailor my posts to your unique needs. 

Tags:  accessibility  How-to  Jennifer Gallagher  Productivity  template  Word ribbon 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Let's Talk About Procedures!

Posted By Joshua Adams, Cornell University, Wednesday, August 14, 2019
Updated: Tuesday, August 27, 2019

Where do Your Procedures Live?

Throughout my years working in policy, I have found that there is one area of little agreement and great discussion—whether or not policies should contain procedures. While there may be something to be said for making a clear distinction between these two instruments of administration, they are inextricably linked to each other: most agree that a policy is not worth much if readers are not told how to “follow it,” i.e., not given procedures or constraints for compliance.

At Cornell, we decided right from the beginning that four criteria would be common to every university policy: (1) possessing broad application across the university; (2) requiring senior-level approval; (3) increasing efficiency, ensuring compliance with law or regulation, or protecting from audit; and (4) containing constraints or procedures for compliance. With that in mind, we began our policy journey, before the existence of the Internet, believing that a university policy must contain even the most granular procedures, to protect the university from any potential claims of ignorance, upon an individual’s non-compliance with policy. This, of course, yielded outlandishly long policy documents, such as our 300-plus-page “Accounting System” policy (which was, thankfully, retired many years ago).

With the advent of the Internet and in the years since, hypertext links have become ubiquitous and expected, and no employee can function without the ability to bounce around from website to website, virtually from office to office, gathering whatever information is needed to complete the task at hand. But where does that leave the policy developers, when considering what procedures to include with a policy, on behalf of the institution? And who takes the responsibility to issue, maintain, and update these various items as needed? I imagine the answers would be wildly varied, and I doubt there is a single institution that would any longer champion the “tomes of yore.”

Cornell’s solution has been a gradual reduction in the number and complexity of procedures contained in official university policies, opting for a more distributed approach, to the point now where most “how to” instructions are housed on sites within their respective administrative areas. But our policies still are required to contain at least a short overview of procedures, with information on how to obtain the minutest of procedural details, on an office website or through other means. We accomplish this balance of completeness with brevity during the policy’s development, or during an existing policy’s periodic review. The balance here, and likely at your institution, depends upon the relative resources available, the complexity and length of the procedures, and an assessment, through judgment, discovery, and analytics, as to the most logical place for the user to look.

Perhaps your institution has a different solution, maybe even to the point that your policy function is not responsible for the maintenance of any procedures at all. However, it is a worthy exercise for institutions to consider these aspects of policy management. I’ll close my post with a battery of questions, designed to elicit opinions and spur discussion. There are no wrong answers.

  • Do your policies contain procedures for compliance? If not, do they point clearly to the location of the procedures?
  • Who owns procedures, and who is responsible for updating them?
  • Does your policy process include the development of procedures?
  • What resources are available to your policy initiative, and is it realistic to expect procedures to be developed through the same system? …and for the central policy library to be the place to house procedures?
  • If procedures are housed outside of your institution’s policy initiative, how does your institution ensure that procedures are kept up-to-date and linked to policies?
  • Do you have separate templates for your policies and your procedures? If not, would this be an effective way to develop policies at your institution? If so, would it be effective to combine them into one template?
  • If your institution’s policies contain any procedures, are minor changes to procedural elements of your policies required to pass through your entire policy process?

Tags:  policy process  procedures  template 

PermalinkComments (2)